Well it's a fool who plays it cool

RSS
therealmulan:

i feel like this is the face social bloggers make when they’re arguing on tumblr

therealmulan:

i feel like this is the face social bloggers make when they’re arguing on tumblr

(Source: peteneems)

inthelightinthesound:

here they sang about ‘tomorrow’ and tomorrow never came.

IDIOSYNCRATIC ROUTINE: takeawaygirl: i hate men much less than i am extremely hurt and...

doulaness:

takeawaygirl:

i hate men much less than i am extremely hurt and disappointed by them

Yes.

While I do have bad feelings about men as a group, it’s not even so much that I hate them but that I am absolutely exhausted by them.

I am tired of turning on the news to find story after story…

phobs-heh:

Jean Louis Gerome

(Source: kotteri000)

30rockedme:

the best gang to ever gang

shorm:

immortal-sunlight-chaos-heart:

hamburgerjack:

satanic2chainz:

dowedare:

angrylittledad:

we-are-star-stuff:

Who says North is up?
Upside Down maps (also known as South-Up or Reversed maps) offer a completely different perspective of the world we live in.
Technically speaking, even referring to the earth with words like “up” or “down” or comparing places with words “above” or “below” is flawed, considering that the earth is a spherical body (it’s actually slightly “fatter” at the equator) and flying through 3 dimensional space with no reference of up or down. However, the issue of “up” and “down” does become an issue when viewing the surface of the earth projected onto a flat piece of paper (a map). And the effect of the orientation of a map is more significant than you might realize.
As all maps require orientation for reference, the issue of how to layout the map orientation is as old as maps themselves. As map orientation is completely arbitrary, it is not surprising that they differed throughout time periods and regions.
The convention of North-up is usually attributed to the Egyptian astronomer Ptolemy (90-168 AD). Justifications for his north-up approach vary. In the middle ages, East was often placed at top. This is the origin of the term “The Orient” to refer to East Asia. During the age of exploration, European cartographers again followed the north-up convention…perhaps because the North Star was their fixed reference point for navigation, or because they wanted (subconsciously or otherwise) to ensure Europe’s claim at the top of the world.
In modern times, reversed maps are made as a learning device or to illustrate Northern Hemisphere bias. Different from simply turning a north-up map upside down, a reversed map has the text oriented to be read with south up.
The famous “Blue Marble” photograph of the Earth taken from on board Apollo 17 was originally oriented with the south pole at the top, with the island of Madagascar visible just left of center, and the continent of Africa at its right. However, the image was turned upside-down to fit the traditional view.
While the orientation of a map might seem harmless, it can have a significant effect on one’s perception of the world, and the relative importance of the different place in it.
In speech, we often refer to places being “above” or “below” others. Think of how you would say you’re about to travel to the state or country to your north or south (to go “down” to Kentucky from Indiana, or “up” to Canada from the US). Without even mentioning geography, ask any grade school student whether Mexico is “above” or “below” the United States. We’re all familiar with the “land down under”. As we often correlate importance to relative height (think how a citizens of a country will fly their flag higher than all other flags), the north-up convention reinforces the idea that northern bodies are more important than their southern neighbors. Suddenly, traveling “down” to the South might have an inference much deeper than geographic location.
After looking at the map more closely, you may realize that the South-Up orientation may change your perception of the relative status of different places. For example, South America suddenly looks to have more prominence, and Africa and the Middle East completely dwarf Europe. Likewise, tucking Northern Europe, Canada, and Russia away at the bottom of the map, subconsciously takes away their status.
To summarize, unconditionally accepting the north-up map convention without at least appreciating the effect stands at odds with viewing all people and places within the world equally. x x

I just happened to be discussing this with one group of sixth graders today on “How do we know that north is north?” One boy in the back row just looked at me, nodded his head in agreement, and did the hand signal for his mind being blown.
I do the signal regularly, so they’re getting it.

I have a map like this. My favorite is when people ask me why it’s upside down and get to play elitist -“who said north was up?”

this is freaking me out

Awesome

i would love to have one of these on my wall.

Even better is the upside-down Hobo-Dyer, which is also aimed at preserving equal area representation!

That’s much more accurate as far as showing just how large Africa really is (and just how friggin’ tiny Europe is).

shorm:

immortal-sunlight-chaos-heart:

hamburgerjack:

satanic2chainz:

dowedare:

angrylittledad:

we-are-star-stuff:

Who says North is up?

Upside Down maps (also known as South-Up or Reversed maps) offer a completely different perspective of the world we live in.

Technically speaking, even referring to the earth with words like “up” or “down” or comparing places with words “above” or “below” is flawed, considering that the earth is a spherical body (it’s actually slightly “fatter” at the equator) and flying through 3 dimensional space with no reference of up or down. However, the issue of “up” and “down” does become an issue when viewing the surface of the earth projected onto a flat piece of paper (a map). And the effect of the orientation of a map is more significant than you might realize.

As all maps require orientation for reference, the issue of how to layout the map orientation is as old as maps themselves. As map orientation is completely arbitrary, it is not surprising that they differed throughout time periods and regions.

The convention of North-up is usually attributed to the Egyptian astronomer Ptolemy (90-168 AD). Justifications for his north-up approach vary. In the middle ages, East was often placed at top. This is the origin of the term “The Orient” to refer to East Asia. During the age of exploration, European cartographers again followed the north-up convention…perhaps because the North Star was their fixed reference point for navigation, or because they wanted (subconsciously or otherwise) to ensure Europe’s claim at the top of the world.

In modern times, reversed maps are made as a learning device or to illustrate Northern Hemisphere bias. Different from simply turning a north-up map upside down, a reversed map has the text oriented to be read with south up.

The famous “Blue Marble” photograph of the Earth taken from on board Apollo 17 was originally oriented with the south pole at the top, with the island of Madagascar visible just left of center, and the continent of Africa at its right. However, the image was turned upside-down to fit the traditional view.

While the orientation of a map might seem harmless, it can have a significant effect on one’s perception of the world, and the relative importance of the different place in it.

In speech, we often refer to places being “above” or “below” others. Think of how you would say you’re about to travel to the state or country to your north or south (to go “down” to Kentucky from Indiana, or “up” to Canada from the US). Without even mentioning geography, ask any grade school student whether Mexico is “above” or “below” the United States. We’re all familiar with the “land down under”. As we often correlate importance to relative height (think how a citizens of a country will fly their flag higher than all other flags), the north-up convention reinforces the idea that northern bodies are more important than their southern neighbors. Suddenly, traveling “down” to the South might have an inference much deeper than geographic location.

After looking at the map more closely, you may realize that the South-Up orientation may change your perception of the relative status of different places. For example, South America suddenly looks to have more prominence, and Africa and the Middle East completely dwarf Europe. Likewise, tucking Northern Europe, Canada, and Russia away at the bottom of the map, subconsciously takes away their status.

To summarize, unconditionally accepting the north-up map convention without at least appreciating the effect stands at odds with viewing all people and places within the world equally. x x

I just happened to be discussing this with one group of sixth graders today on “How do we know that north is north?” One boy in the back row just looked at me, nodded his head in agreement, and did the hand signal for his mind being blown.

I do the signal regularly, so they’re getting it.

I have a map like this. My favorite is when people ask me why it’s upside down and get to play elitist -“who said north was up?”

this is freaking me out

Awesome

i would love to have one of these on my wall.

Even better is the upside-down Hobo-Dyer, which is also aimed at preserving equal area representation!

That’s much more accurate as far as showing just how large Africa really is (and just how friggin’ tiny Europe is).

lambylingames:

you wanted them

lambylingames:

you wanted them

girljanitor:

innocent-bystanders-inc:

nudiemuse:

princelesscomic:

girljanitor:

Self Evident Truths

S. Ross Browne

Ummm…I am so VERY into this right now!

But Black people in period or fantasy settings totally makes the stories unreal.

Also holy shit I love these.

How come I don’t run across this stuff regularly?

Because of racism and the retroactive erasure of POC in Medieval Europe. Pretty much the same reason you almost never see these works of art either unless you’re already looking for them:

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

invaderlye:

Good Omens sketch dump
…don’t ask

invaderlye:

Good Omens sketch dump

…don’t ask

lirlys:

megank327:

Fathers of the year. Hell yeah!

artist credit added

lirlys:

megank327:

Fathers of the year. Hell yeah!

artist credit added

  • Islamophobic: their Koran permits them to beat their wives...
  • Me: Yes it does but could you tell me what with?
  • Islamophobic: ...
  • Me: A blade of grass, I don't know the last time you tried to beat someone with a blade of grass but it is pretty damn impossible, you must look at the people the Qur'an was revealed to, the Arabs at that time (just like most of the world) would beat their wives brutally. To tell them they couldn't beat their wives would have caused rebellion, so Allah (swt) being the greatest of planners, revealed it in a way that was so clever. It permitted them to beat their wives (as not to cause rebellion) however only with a blade of grass (which we all know to be impossible). Then the most beautiful line came saying but surely it is better for you to forgive, do you see now that the Qur'an does not permit the brutal beating of wives which in that time would have saved the lives of many women.
kope40:

ハムちゃん描くの楽しいわぁ。
んでもってハムちゃんしゃれおつー。

kope40:

ハムちゃん描くの楽しいわぁ。

んでもってハムちゃんしゃれおつー。

writingcyan:

inklou:

This was supposed to be a quick sketch…that went out of hand //whyy
w/e it probably says something about how much I loved that disturbingly maniacal Meet the Pyro short!

Woah, this is amazing—I love the colours and composition in this picture! And I love that it’s Pyro vs. Scout. Pyro is damn scary!

writingcyan:

inklou:

This was supposed to be a quick sketch…that went out of hand //whyy

w/e it probably says something about how much I loved that disturbingly maniacal Meet the Pyro short!

Woah, this is amazing—I love the colours and composition in this picture! And I love that it’s Pyro vs. Scout. Pyro is damn scary!

(Source: koulin)

detention:

queued~bye.

detention:

queued~bye.

(Source: over-there)